One of the biggest stresses families and women face during pregnancy and after giving birth is maternity leave. Although most companies offer Family Medical Leave or short term disability, there’s a huge population of women in the U.S that are forced to take unpaid leave after giving birth. Even with more men opting to take leave, households without two incomes can still be stressful for some.  But that could change soon.

Democratic Legislator Rep. Rosa DeLauro (CT) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) have proposed a nationwide paid maternity leave. The proposed Family Act  seeks to establish an independent trust fund within the Social Security Administration. The fund would be financed by a new payroll contribution from employees and employers of 0.2 percent of wages, to pay benefits and administrative costs.

The Family Act would:

  • Provide workers with up to 12 weeks of partial income when they take time for their own serious health condition, including pregnancy and childbirth recovery; the serious health condition of a child, parent, spouse or domestic partner; the birth or adoption of a  child; and/or for particular military caregiving and leave purposes.
  • Enable workers to earn 66 percent of their monthly wages, up to a capped amount.
  • Cover workers in all companies, no matter their size. Younger, part-time, lower-wage and contingent workers would be eligible for benefits.
  • Be funded by small employee and employer payroll contributions of two-tenths of one percent each (two cents per $10 in wages), or about $1.50 per week for a typical worker.
  • Be administered through a new Office of Paid Family and Medical Leave within the Social Security Administration. Payroll contributions would cover both insurance benefits and administrative costs.

The act isn’t without critics. The National Federation of Independent Business feel the bill would remove the flexibility companies now have to offer when it comes to leave. Currently most companies only offer  up to 12 weeks of unpaid time after childbirth under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Federal and other government employees can also take uncompensated time.


Clutchettes, what do you think about nationwide maternity leave?

Tags: ,
Like Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter
  • Me

    i know this a big deal, and i like where it’s going but i’ma need people to start putting pressure on paternity leave too. i mean imagine if both parents got a couple months off to bond w/baby? y’all could go 4-6 months without having to leave your kid w/strangers if y’all time it right. i would love to not have to leave my kids w/anybody until they can walk and say no… that way the kid would be able to give me real clues if the person i’m leving him/her with is mistreating my baby… ijs

    but i agree w/the person who said it shouldn’t be a tax. it should be insurance just like they do life insurance. you pay for how much you need if you wanna be covered for those months outta work. and then companies should just be required to hold maternity/paternity leave positions open for you to come back within a certain number of months before they allowed to permanently replace you. idk if that would work for everybody but just a thought.

    • My Opinion

      I like the idea of insurance, but with only people who expect to be having children in the near future would pay for the insurance. I’m not sure if this will be enough to sustain such a program. You might as well put the money in your savings account. It’s the same problem with universal healthcare. It’s only affordable if enough people pay into the program. I haven’t done any math so maybe the insurance idea could work though.