130631120_sq-2c2b5065ffcba666e1fa032cd6138758c13e0dbe-s2-c85On Sunday, Gov. Jerry Brown announced he signed the first bill of its kind to define when “yes means yes.” The bill requires all California state colleges and universities to adopt a policy of a clear-cut, affirmative consent by students who engage in sexual activity.

Last month, California State Senate voted to approve SB967, composed by Sen. Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, which defines consent as “an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity.”

The bill is a result of an intense focus on sexual assault across college campuses.

“Every student deserves a learning environment that is safe and healthy,” De Leon said in a statement Sunday night. “The State of California will not allow schools to sweep rape cases under the rug. We’ve shifted the conversation regarding sexual assault to one of prevention, justice, and healing.”

The new bill clearly states silence or lack of consent does not constitute consent. Also, if an individual is drunk, drugged, sleep or unconscious, the individual cannot give consent.

In addition to unambiguously defining consent, the new legislation requires training for faculty in charge of reviewing complaints so that victims are not questioned inappropriately, while filing complaints. It also requires access to counseling, health care services and other resources.

This is the first bill in the country to make affirmative consent language an essential principle of school sexual assault polices.

Tags: , ,
Like Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter
  • Kenan

    With everything said I don’t see what this bill will actually accomplish. What exactly counts as clear-cut, affirmative consent? Last I checked, It’s very rare that anyone man or woman verbally asks if they can have sex with someone before they have sex. It usually just kinda happens.

  • Anthony

    @Kenan, the problem with it kinda happens is that a man is forced to guess, and if he guesses wrong, he has got a life changing court case in front of him.

    When I was young, I certainly remember times when my girlfriend just hinted when she wanted it. If I guess right, we had a good time, if I guessed wrong, I was chewed out.

    With the new law, both sides take responsibility for what they are doing.

    • Anthony

      Obviously, if a man gets a no, or if the woman is impaired or otherwise unable to answer, then “no” is clear as a bell. I am referring to situations where couples have a history, and sometimes are coy or playful.

    • thetruth

      Well obviously if you guessed wrong, your girl would’ve let you know before you went too far. Right?

    • Anthony

      @Truth, yes she did. My concern would be for young folks who really don’t each other. My example was not that good. Sometimes, a point looks worse after I read it.

      My bottom line is that I think having to actually get a yes removes all ambiguity and makes both parties take responsibility for what they are doing.